The
inaugural session focussed on the conceptual understanding of the idea of smart
cities. The smart city programme was described as an “evolving idea” that has
been built upon previous reform measures and includes creation of specialised
entities such as Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), Smart City Advisory Forum,
etc., and use of digital technology for improved service delivery and
governance. Specific emphasis was laid on looking at the paradigm difference in
interpreting the concept (subjective vs. objective) of smart cities, and the
governance challenges in implementing the smart city plans. It was reiterated
that the smart cities mission should be seen as an “opportunity to reorient ourselves”
through redefining the idea of smartness, prioritising what is smart (natural
vs. man-made) and by integration of local wisdom with global knowledge and
technology.
The
session on ‘inclusive cities’ reiterated the need for understanding city needs with
respect to its people and the urban poor (Bhawna Bali). Specific example of a
slum clearance measure in Dharamshala was shared and its negative impacts on
the lives of slum dwellers were highlighted (Manshi Asher). Stress was given on
inclusive planning for poor neighbourhoods and migrant population. Also, it was
suggested that the socio-economic profile of the slum population be considered
in planning rehabilitation. A presentation on big data and command control
centres was made to draw attention to possible negative impacts (Leon Morenas).
This showed how cities are being viewed as a collection of numbers and their
issues being delinked from their history and political economy. The possible
misuse of sensitive information in the name of surveillance was also pointed
out. Further, various aspects of education (such as the curriculum, learning
outcomes, enrolment) to be considered in the making of a smart city as also
smart citizens were highlighted (Shruti Taneja). Integration of ICT into school
curriculum as also for teacher development and management was pointed as an
important enabler to create smart schools and responsive education system.
‘Smart
infrastructure and mobility’, the second session, critically examined
affordable housing programmes and pointed out that the end user and their needs
be considered in planning for affordable housing (Abhijit Datey). Other aspects
discussed included use of local building material and technology to construct
housing that is sensitive and responds to its natural landscape (Dhruv Sud).
However, given the enormity of the housing shortage in the country, the need
for cost effective solutions and alternative construction management technology
was highlighted. Discussion also took place on building resilience in hill
cities for disaster management and integrating the same with sectoral planning
(Komal Kantariya). It was mentioned that settlement structure should be
responsive/sensitive to its natural conditions (topography), local culture and
belief systems (through involvement of people) (Sugandha). Further, due to the
hilly terrain, it is important to take into account the proximity to
infrastructure and resources while planning settlements.
With
reference to Shimla, it was said that the urban design should be such that it
helps the city rediscover its identity while becoming progressive and modern in
technology use (Anshu Dadwal). Emphasis was laid on local economic development
and improved tourist infrastructure. Smart urban mobility options were also
discussed in this session especially with respect to hill cities, including the
need for: (a) alternative transport modes such as rope ways and dedicated
walking and cycling tracks; (b) traffic management measures through route
planning (one-way/lane segregation); and (c) use of IT for traffic management
and accident response (Deepti Jain, Hitanshu Jitshu).
The
use of alternative technologies for building construction especially in cold
climates for achieving energy efficiency (G. Kanagraj) was discussed during the
third session on ‘smart resource management’. Innovative green solutions for
mobility (solar power operated transportation), clean water (waste water recycling, recharge water bodies) and air (low carbon emissions through
national voluntary program to reduce greenhouse emissions, green building and
green product development, and creating waste free societies) were particularly
highlighted (Shalini Sharma). It was emphasised that common ideas need to be
debated to manage common resources (Abhishek Taneja).
The
session on ‘smart governance’ again emphasised the need for provision of ICT
driven citizen-centric services. The significance of evolving
guidelines/policies accommodating the concerns of the hill cities and
imposition of penalty to ensure rule compliance was also discussed. SMART was
interpreted as Sustainable-Measurable-Achievable-Resilient-Transformation of
cities. The session also brought out larger urban management issues such as
citizen participation in urban governance, non/partial-implementation of
important urban reforms including 74th CAA, gaps in planning and implementation
of key infrastructure, non-addressal of issues such as peri-urbanisation,
regional development and spatial planning (A.N. Gautam).
Further, a
detailed presentation on Smart City Proposal of Shimla city by Prashant Sirkek
(Joint Commissioner, Shimla Municipal Corporation) brought out key concerns
requiring attention, such as ropeways, environment conservation measures
(including ban on felling of trees), innovative waste management through waste
to energy plants, etc.